Katsina State government is facing intense criticism over plans to release approximately 70 detained individuals suspected of banditry as part of what officials describe as peace negotiations with repentant criminals in the region.
State authorities have defended the initiative as part of community-led peace efforts designed to reduce violence and secure the freedom of kidnapping victims across affected local government areas.
However, the proposal has triggered fierce public backlash. Critics—including civil society organizations, security analysts, and ordinary citizens—argue that releasing suspects already facing prosecution severely undermines the justice system and denies victims of deadly violence, mass kidnappings, and property destruction any meaningful closure.
Many warn the move could strengthen criminal networks and erode public trust in Nigeria’s legal and security institutions.
The controversy has escalated to the national level, with senior federal security officials cautioning against negotiations with armed criminal groups. Opponents insist sustainable peace requires accountability, comprehensive disarmament, and strong law enforcement—not the release of detained suspects, particularly given the region’s ongoing security crisis.
Dr. Bashir Kurfi, Convener of the Katsina Security Community Initiative and a local resident deeply invested in the state’s security, offered a pointed assessment of the situation, warning that neighboring states face serious consequences.
As someone deeply familiar with Katsina’s security challenges, what’s your view on releasing these 70 detained suspects?
This decision is both unfortunate and extremely dangerous for the entire country. Releasing hardened criminals detained under court orders creates a terrible precedent. Most of these individuals face unbailable charges involving rape, arson, and murder. The idea that anyone could justify their release under any circumstances is reckless. I’d be surprised if any chief judge who values their career would participate in this.
Government statements comparing this to wartime prisoner exchanges are fundamentally misguided. The kidnapped civilians weren’t prisoners—they were taken from their homes. These victims aren’t police officers, government officials, or politicians. Most are ordinary people, farmers. How can anyone call this a “prisoner exchange”? These people were abducted, violated, and held for ransom.
Let me share an example from my own community. Bandits once raided a home while the husband, a theatre nurse, was at the hospital saving lives. They found his wife with their infant twins and forced her to follow them. One bandit carried a two-month-old baby without clothing into the bush. Their five-year-old insisted on following his mother. The family paid five million naira for their release. Now, with this plan, that criminal could walk freely through town and markets. How should victims feel seeing their tormentors unpunished?
Many believe this difficult step might bring lasting peace.
There’s nothing “necessary” about this. Considering it shows deep irresponsibility. This creates serious dangers. These individuals will interact with other hardened criminals in detention and then move to neighboring states after release. Kano State will face significant trouble when this happens.
You expect this will directly impact Kano?
It won’t just impact Kano—they’ll go there directly. Criminals already steal from Kano and pass through our areas with stolen goods. Under this “peace deal,” if they didn’t steal locally but elsewhere, they simply pass through unchallenged. Previously, we blocked routes preventing them from reaching Kano. Now, without considering consequences, we’re opening pathways. The North already suffered when Boko Haram devastated the North-East’s economy and destroyed Maiduguri’s status as an international trade hub. Now Kano’s commercial viability is being threatened. Daily traffic from Sokoto to Kano, which used to exceed 50 vehicles, has collapsed.
Do you think this is happening accidentally or by design?
This appears deliberate because I cannot understand it otherwise. Officials claim this is a community initiative, yet I chair the state community initiative, and we weren’t consulted. We worked with police establishing productive cooperation until these structures were dismantled. Which communities were actually consulted? Proper negotiation requires assembling a representative team.
What motivates the government’s approach?
This requires careful study because the implications are concerning. The current Defence Minister, when he served as Joint Chief of Staff, stated security agencies shouldn’t participate in such negotiations. Yet state government is making independent decisions without understanding ramifications. When commissioners suggest the next step is collecting guns, it reveals dangerous ignorance.
Negotiation is an international convention for serious parties with ideological positions. Bandits are what Karl Marx called lumpen elements—dangerous because they lack class identity. They’re not farmers who can be mobilized with fertilizer or workers motivated by wages. They have no unified command structure. The leader in Batsari doesn’t answer to those in Dan Musa, Kankara, or elsewhere. We don’t even know if agreements exist with all bandit leaders.
What I know is they’ve spoken with some so-called leaders. Even then, not everyone agrees. Banditry continues. Three days ago in my local government, cattle were stolen. Six days earlier, about 20 cows disappeared.
How does government benefit?
From experience, some politicians use bandit leaders during elections. They collect ballot boxes from inaccessible areas, give them to bandits who fill and return them. Nigerian politicians prioritize political office over citizens’ security. Have you seen politicians across parties unite to say enough bloodshed? Never. Women visit my home daily with husbands, describing gang rapes by as many as 10 men. We’ve taken some to hospitals; others required specialized treatment for severe physical damage.
Could any form of amnesty work?
No. Amnesty isn’t applicable here. This isn’t serious governance. You don’t seat murderers alongside authorities while they retain weapons. Disarmament is a professional process requiring experts, not politicians. How would anyone verify surrendered weapons? Meanwhile, village and district heads have abandoned their domains. Commissioners cannot spend a week in their hometowns.
Who wins and loses from this policy?
We lose. People cannot farm, graze livestock, or access markets safely. Seventy percent of schools remain closed; some are occupied by bandits. The broader losers are all Nigerian states. This exposes the irresponsibility of northern elites living comfortably in Abuja and Lagos while their people suffer daily violence. Southern states shouldn’t bear the financial burden of security spending caused by this elite negligence.
READ ALSO:
- Putin Offers to Mediate Iran–US Tensions After Collapse of Negotiations
- INEC Denies Copying Statement from Tinubu’s Aide, Insists Claims Are False
- Ambode Lost Second Term Over Failure To Align With Tinubu’s Expectations – Ex-Presidential Aide
- Dozens Feared Dead as Airstrike Hits Border Market in Borno–Yobe
- Dauda Lawal Mourns Victims Of Bandits’ Attack In Bukkuyum
